Intrauterine Devices

on 22.12.07 with 0 comments



Background

  • 49% of pregnancies are unintended

  • Use of IUD: 11.9 percent of women of reproductive age worldwide, but by only 1.5 percent of women in North America

  • Not for pregnant, those with PID, anatomically distorted uterus (Table 1 for further contraindications)


Major Discussion Tasks

  • Provide information for a variety of contraceptives

  • Lower pregnancy rate despite higher % of ectopic pregnancies from IUD’s make for less overall ectopic pregnancies than other birth control methods.

  • Increased risk of PID attributable to time of introduction only


Device Types in US

  • Copper-releasing device (ParaGard)

    • Prevents sperm transport and mobility

    • Failure rate of 1.26 per 100 woman-years

  • Progestin intrauterine system (Mirena)

    • Creates cervical mucus plug and may reduce flow

    • Alters sperm transport and mobility

    • Failure rate of 0.09 per 100 woman-years

  • Both alter uterine lining—may prevent implantation


Management

  • Low cost: $175 – 500 for visit and insertion

  • Reversible

  • Last 10 – 12 (ParaGard) and 3 – 5 (Mirena) years

  • Non-estrogen based


Side Effects (in first weeks to months)

  • Bleeding

  • Dysmennorhea

  • 2 – 10 % expel IUD in first year


Procedure

  • Strict STD screening prior to insertion

  • Preparation of patient (similar to pap smear)

  • Cervix fixation with tenaculum

  • Sound the uterus, determining position

  • Insertion of prepared device

  • Trim excess string

  • Follow up ultrasound for position


References

  • Wier, E. “Preventing pregnancy: a fresh look at the IUD.” CMAJ. Sept. 16, 2003; 169 (6)

  • Johnson, BA. ”Insertion and Removal of Intrauterine Devices.” American Family Physician. Vol 71, Issue 1, Jan 2005.

  • Johnson, J. “Intrauterine Devices.” Federation of America. 2005


Category: Gynecology Notes

POST COMMENT

0 comments:

Post a Comment