You are here: Home » Gynecology Notes » Intrauterine Devices
Background
49% of pregnancies are unintended
Use of IUD: 11.9 percent of women of reproductive age worldwide, but by only 1.5 percent of women in North America
Not for pregnant, those with PID, anatomically distorted uterus (Table 1 for further contraindications)
Major Discussion Tasks
Provide information for a variety of contraceptives
Lower pregnancy rate despite higher % of ectopic pregnancies from IUD’s make for less overall ectopic pregnancies than other birth control methods.
Increased risk of PID attributable to time of introduction only
Device Types in US
Copper-releasing device (ParaGard)
Prevents sperm transport and mobility
Failure rate of 1.26 per 100 woman-years
Progestin intrauterine system (Mirena)
Creates cervical mucus plug and may reduce flow
Alters sperm transport and mobility
Failure rate of 0.09 per 100 woman-years
Both alter uterine lining—may prevent implantation
Management
Low cost: $175 – 500 for visit and insertion
Reversible
Last 10 – 12 (ParaGard) and 3 – 5 (Mirena) years
Non-estrogen based
Side Effects (in first weeks to months)
Bleeding
Dysmennorhea
2 – 10 % expel IUD in first year
Procedure
Strict STD screening prior to insertion
Preparation of patient (similar to pap smear)
Cervix fixation with tenaculum
Sound the uterus, determining position
Insertion of prepared device
Trim excess string
Follow up ultrasound for position
References
Wier, E. “Preventing pregnancy: a fresh look at the IUD.” CMAJ. Sept. 16, 2003; 169 (6)
Johnson, BA. ”Insertion and Removal of Intrauterine Devices.” American Family Physician. Vol 71, Issue 1, Jan 2005.
Johnson, J. “Intrauterine Devices.” Federation of America. 2005
Category: Gynecology Notes
POST COMMENT
0 comments:
Post a Comment